the god delusion
![]()
I read The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins while flying back to the States. I haven’t read a book like this for a while and I’ve been hearing a lot about this one, so I thought I’d give it a read. Dawkins is a leading evolutionary biologist, atheist, and outspoken critic of religion, especially Christianity. Dawkins has written a number of books on evolution and popular science, but The God Delusion is a more deliberate effort by Dawkins to layout exactly why God “almost certainly does not exist” and the harm that results as a consequence of all religious beliefs. Lately I’ve been interested in the connection between faith and science, which is another reason why the book piqued my interest. I thought Dawkins, being a world-class scientist, might give me some new perspectives on why science and faith just can’t seem to get along. Ever since the Enlightenment, the dialogue between science and faith has gone something like this:
Science: I can’t see you, so you don’t exist.
Faith: You threaten me, so I’d rather be ignorant. Besides, you’re going to hell.
While I can’t say Dawkins improves much on this dialogue, the book did give me some new perspectives. A few years ago I probably would have felt really threatened by this book and instead of seriously thinking about what Dawkins has to say; maybe I would have just dismissed it and attacked in return. Sadly, I suspect that many Christians will do this with The God Delusion. Given that roughly 85% of the world’s population adheres to a religion, and of the 15% of the “nonreligious” population left, only 2.5% consider themselves to be atheists (those stats are from World Christian Trends and Adherents.com), I don’t think there’s much reason for religion to feel threatened; it’s not going away anytime soon. Besides that, there is sometimes a prophetic voice behind a critical voice, if we have ears to hear it. I’ll let you draw your own conclusions if you read the book, but here are my thoughts: A lot of what Dawkins says in this book is fairly weak in terms of its ability to prove that God does not exist and all religion is destructive (in my opinion). Some of what he says is just blatantly wrong. But some of it American Christians need to take to heart and grapple with. I say “American Christians” because Dawkins mainly uses Christianity for negative examples of religion, and most of his examples come from America. Dawkins reflects on his experience with American Christianity, and what results is a very interesting, very sad picture. Instead of seeing Jesus, he sees a judgmental, morally proud, gay-hating, scientifically ignorant, greedy, war-mongering, intolerant group of people. Now, obviously I don’t think that is a fair assessment of Christians in America. But after reading The God Delusion, it’s plain to see that Dawkins’ sincere perception of Christianity is deeply skewed. As easy as it is to say that if only he could see Jesus for who he really is he would think differently, the point is that he doesn’t see Jesus. He sees something totally different, and I think it’s worth asking why. Maybe Dawkins is just interacting with a few crazy fundamentalists, and we’re off the hook. Or maybe there is some truth in it all that we need to consider; an attitude to guard against or correct. Either way, criticisms like Dawkins’ should cause us to humbly return to the teachings of Jesus and to see if maybe we have missed His heart at some point. At the very least it is a good reminder that we are Christ’s representatives, and as such we are the first point of contact for those desiring to encounter the Christian God. If a homosexual, an Iraqi, a Muslim, someone with a different skin color, a different political party, a different financial bracket, an evolutionist, or an addict walked through the doors of an American church, would they encounter Jesus? Or would they even make it to the door?